The EPIC-Norfolk Study
Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and the risk of breast cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition: a nested case-control study.
International journal of cancer 2013 ; 133: 1689-700.
Kühn T, Kaaks R, Becker S, Eomois PP, Clavel-Chapelon F, Kvaskoff M, Dossus L, Tjønneland A, Olsen A, Overvad K, Chang-Claude J, Lukanova A, Buijsse B, Boeing H, Trichopoulou A, Lagiou P, Bamia C, Masala G, Krogh V, Sacerdote C, Tumino R, Mattiello A, Buckland G, Sánchez MJ, Menéndez V, Chirlaque MD, Barricarte A, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, van Duijnhoven FJ, van Gils CH, Bakker MF, Weiderpass E, Skeie G, Brustad M, Andersson A, Sund M, Wareham N, Khaw KT, Travis RC, Schmidt JA, Rinaldi S, Romieu I, Gallo V, Murphy N, Riboli E, and Linseisen J
DOI : 10.1002/ijc.28172
PubMed ID : 23526380
PMCID :
URL : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ijc.28172
Abstract
Experimental evidence suggests that vitamin D might play a role in the development of breast cancer. Although the results of case-control studies indicate that circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] is inversely associated with the risk of breast cancer, the results of prospective studies are inconsistent. A case-control study embedded in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) was carried out comprising 1,391 incident breast cancer cases and 1,391 controls. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models did not reveal a significant overall association between season-standardized 25(OH)D levels and the risk of breast cancer (ORQ4-Q1 [95% CI]: 1.07 [0.85-1.36], ptrend = 0.67). Moreover, 25(OH)D levels were not related to the risks of estrogen receptor positive tumors (ORQ4-Q1 [95% CI]: 0.97 [0.67-1.38], ptrend = 0.90) and estrogen receptor negative tumors (ORQ4-Q1 [95% CI]: 0.97 [0.66-1.42], ptrend = 0.98). In hormone replacement therapy (HRT) users, 25(OH)D was significantly inversely associated with incident breast cancer (ORlog2 [95% CI]: 0.62 [0.42-0.90], p = 0.01), whereas no significant association was found in HRT nonusers (ORlog2 [95% CI]: 1.14 [0.80-1.62], p = 0.48). Further, a nonsignificant inverse association was found in women with body mass indices (BMI) < 25 kg/m(2) (ORlog2 [95% CI]: 0.83 [0.67-1.03], p = 0.09), as opposed to a borderline significant positive association in women with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) (ORlog2 [95% CI]: 1.30 [1.0-1.69], p = 0.05). Overall, prediagnostic levels of circulating 25(OH)D were not related to the risk of breast cancer in the EPIC study. This result is in line with findings in the majority of prospective studies and does not support a role of vitamin D in the development of breast cancer.