The EPIC-Norfolk Study
Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast cancer?
Lancet (London, England) 2003 ; 362: 212-4.
Bingham SA, Luben R, Welch A, Wareham N, Khaw KT, and Day N
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13913-X
PubMed ID : 12885485
PMCID :
URL : https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S014067360313913X
Abstract
Pooled analyses of cohort studies show no relation between fat intake and breast-cancer risk. However, food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) methods used in these studies are prone to measurement error. We assessed diet with an FFQ and a detailed 7-day food diary in 13070 women between 1993 and 1997. We compared 168 breast-cancer cases incident by 2000 with four matched controls. Risk of breast cancer was associated with saturated-fat intake measured with the food diary (hazard ratio 1.22 [95% CI 1.06-1.40], p=0.005, per quintile increase in energy-adjusted fat intake), but not with saturated fat measured with the FFQ (1.10 [0.94-1.29], p=0.23). Dietary measurement error might explain the absence of a significant association between dietary fat and breast-cancer risk in cohort studies.